9 Comments

Interesting data from a small cohort. I am always suspicious of reporting on studies that use alarming and dramatic language, kind of undercuts their scientific authority. Same as when they lean heavily on the drama bell with reporting on nutrition research. I see a lot of overly dramatic and adjective-laden language in the comments here, which, unfortunately, shuts down meaningful dialogue.

Expand full comment
author

David

Thanks for commenting.

I am always suspicious as well, but the same is occurring with the scientific “authority”. In science the authority should embrace dissent, not censor it. In science the authority should welcome open debate and dialogue, not cancel those who go against the present narrative.

I read recently something that struck home.

The greatest scientific discoveries in the world were found by scientists who went AGAINST the prevailing thoughts or narrative.

I think what we are seeing in the comments are individuals frustrated about the censorship and cancel culture. Also I have not yet seen anyone on this substack cancel anyone or be argumentative in an aggressive manner. If they do I would block them not for their views which may be different, but for their overly aggressive way they show it.

People are allowed to have their opinions and they need not keep it to themselves in a free society. But in a civil society there needs to be a way to differ in opinion while remaining civil if not actually friendly regardless.

I don’t think anyone likes bullies.

But let’s see who has been the bully and who has been bullied over the past three years.

Expand full comment

Good points Doc. There is already enough censoring out there, and no need to add to it here. As long as people keep it civil, we can always agree to disagree.

Expand full comment

I agree wholeheartedly.

However, using words like "Luciferian" and "Genociders" for people, researchers, etc,that have a differing opinion is, absolutely, a tactic to try to control the discussion. This type of overly dramatic language does nothing but enflame, and is designed to.

I would like to have some discussion on the study itself so as to better understand our world.

Expand full comment
author

Good points.

The enflamed dialogue I believe was meant towards those in charge who have been responsible for what many believe to be the censors and cancel culture if you oppose the narrative.

As it was not meant for anyone here wanting to have a discussion it is just someone stating their views.

A discussion can still be had.

Not every question or comment needs a response. Choose who you want to engage with civilly and we usually all can learn from that.

Expand full comment

My sister who has had her shots and from what I hear has all her boosters (we don’t discuss it because she is a big believer in these shots and I am against them) now has covid for the FOURTH time. There were about 10 family members who all had it about the same time, and they all cleared it pretty quickly (even my mom who is 77 with cancer and overweight, who did have original shots 😞 which I am sure CAUSED her multiple myeloma cancer, but I digress...). However, my sister is taking longer to get over it and still no taste and smell, day 6. She was also prescribed Paxlovid. She is obese and does not exercise at all, so between that and all the shots, I fear for her all the time. Unfortunately, I can not talk to her about it because she is not open to listening. But she is Big Pharma’s dream patient - keep shooting her up, getting covid, give Paxlovid, and making her more susceptible to other illnesses that require prescriptions....

Expand full comment

Well, as Barry commented, he should summarise findings for laypersons but as he posts so frequently, he probably has no time. We already know they don't do what it says on the can! We already know LNP casing ingredients are toxic and unstable and not to be given by injection. We already know they have many contaminants, DNA, metals, fragmented mRNA, that schizer's contain SV40 which causes cancers and the synthetic spike protein the mRNA programmes your cells into a factory producing does not have an 'OFF'switch, neither does it stay in deltoid but goes all over body causing inflamation wherever they land.The technique to turn off natural defences by Kariko et. al to allow LNPs into cells "earned" them a Nobel prize which am am now learning goes to genociders! We know, and knew before, that they were dangerous and didn't work:- they didn't have to because no one has a record anywhere in world of this SARSCov2 virus, or any other for that matter. So, now we have highjacked/damaged healing systems. No doubt pHARMA are jumping with joy for all new customers they will get and genociders will just sit back for carnage to unfold.

Expand full comment

100%! Yes, we have known these things about these luciferian injections since the beginning, and it’s not surprising that our own government and their genocidal taskmasters are pushing for more profit laden death, but where are the willing arms still coming from after almost three years? Wilful ignorance is a powerful drug…

https://youtu.be/lbaXwc4LtXI?si=uSYXGDTvQbRT6tUZ

Expand full comment

I spoke to an 80 year old woman in waiting lounge area of car repair shop. She informed me she had received 6 already! I was shocked she was still alive tbh and I told her a few truths but she'll probably fall in line again.

Expand full comment