Let’s try something new.
I am going to put some research mechanisms about potential treatments for some illnesses.
I will ask you to tell me in the comments section if you would use the intervention(s) for the condition(s) mentioned.
Don’t try and figure out what the intervention(s) are. Just let me know if it sounds plausible that you would use the intervention, assuming always that it is safe and effective. Not safe and effective like we have heard from the CDC and FDA since January 2021, but truly safe and effective.
See pic below.
The treatment(s) mentioned below are in this chart, but the name blacked out.
So this intervention appears much safer than COVID mRNA injections, Tylenol, dexamethasone steroid, flu vaccines and hydroxychloroquine. But look at the numbers associated with the above yourself and make up your own mind. The chart is from 2022.
1- This intervention, let’s call it W, can calm down the body's overreaction to infection or disease by reducing inflammation signals, by downregulating the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. So it may act as an Anti-inflammatory and is potentially useful in conditions like asthma or autoimmune diseases where inflammation plays a key role.
2- This intervention, let’s call it X, via emerging Research, might kill off some bacteria and fungi, but we're still figuring out how. So it may act as an anti-bacterial and anti-fungal. It may even act as an anti-parasite by messing with their nerve and muscle functions.
Wow Sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation. Not sure if that is a good thing or bad thing.
3- This intervention, let’s call it Y, can stop some viruses from spreading inside cells by blocking the nuclear import of viral proteins by binding to the host protein importin α/β1, which is crucial for the replication of several RNA viruses. So it may act as an anti-viral.
4- This intervention, let’s call it Z, might help make cancer treatments work better by stopping cancer cells from becoming resistant and encouraging cancer cells to die off. It may inhibit P-glycoprotein, potentially reversing multidrug resistance in cancer cells. It might also induce programmed cell death in some cancer cell lines. So it may work as anti-cancer.
5- Let’s add a few more possibilities Would you use any of W thru Z if they have also been found to help treat cystic acne and Rosacea? What if it may improve brain health?
I guess that’s enough for now.
If W, X , Y and Z are potential treatments for the above mentioned conditions, and had been used safely for other conditions for a few decades, but was not yet FDA approved for the conditions mentioned in todays post, would you be willing to use those treatment(s) if under medical supervision?
So let’s hear from y’all.
Not only is Ivermectin effective, it’s one of the safest drugs ever to come to market. I took, Ivermectin, and a few other treatments, in 2021 when I had the ChinaFlu. I was better in a matter of days with no lingering issues. Some of my friends who opted against it or who ended up hospitalized are still having problems.
I now have three friends who have been diagnosed with three different cancers in the last six months. Two have been jabbed, prostate cancer and Stage 4 colon cancer. The third, with Stage 3 brain cancer, is a pure blood.
They are all using a protocol of Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, intravenous Vitamin C, among other supplements. The prostate cancer patient has seen excellent reduction in his PSA numbers and tests. The colon cancer patient just started the protocol a few weeks ago after chemo and radiation failed. He hasn’t tested yet for changes. The brain cancer patient is currently using a protocol from Dr. Makis along with conventional treatments. Her cancer is very aggressive so she opted for everything. It will be interesting to see how these three people fair using both conventional treatment and untraditional protocols.
Would I use IVM, Fenbendazole, etc if I were diagnosed with cancer? Absolutely. The research is stunning. And it’s a disgrace that’s it’s been suppressed for years and years.
I agree with both Thomas and Cindy. I would also especially trust working with Dr H to monitor and give medical supervision because I know he does his research and doesn’t rely on pharmaceutical companies to SELL him on what to think.