No wonder many people are confused.
Here is the conclusion from a study on a COVID mRNA injection.
“Previous natural infection was associated with lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of the variant, than mRNA primary-series vaccination. Vaccination remains the safest and most optimal tool for protecting against infection and COVID-19-related hospitalisation and death, irrespective of previous infection status.”
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(22)00287-7/fulltext
So there are two sentences in that quote.
Sentence #1
“Previous natural infection was associated with lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of the variant, than mRNA primary-series vaccination.”
So it sounds like if you had COVID previously, regardless of which COVID variant, you are LESS likely to get infected again than someone who has had their primary series of mRNA injections.
Or more simply:
Natural immunity trumps mRNA injections in preventing future COVID infections.
Then they add in Sentence #2
‘Vaccination remains the safest and most optimal tool for protecting against infection and COVID-19-related hospitalisation and death, irrespective of previous infection status.”
Now after saying you are less likely to get infected again if you have prior natural immunity, you are still somehow better off getting the mRNA injections to prevent hospitalization and death. I almost understand that they are trying to say that the mRNA injections somehow offer protection against hospitalization and death while also increasing your risk of getting infected.
Wait now I am talking in circles just like they appear to be writing in circles.
So I decided to take a deeper dive here.
Here is a study that states that the more mRNA injections you get, the more antibodies you produce, but with a catch. The antibodies that get produced after your 3rd and subsequent shots produce more of what is called IgG4. The issue with IgG4 is that instead of increasing the attack on the antigen (the spike protein in this case), it creates instead an “immune tolerance”, meaning it leaves the spike alone and doesn’t mess with it. So the immune system upon seeing the spike protein in essence, stands down. These IgG4 antibodies occur naturally to prevent a continued overproduction of antibodies that would cause excessive amounts of inflammation, which could harm our body. But here they are being produced in larger amounts starting at COVID mRNA injection #3, and most likely even more with each successive booster. Is this a mechanism by which the more mRNA injections you get the higher the risk of getting COVID? If your IgG4 are telling the immune system to stand down and not fight if it sees the COVID spike then what happens when it is exposed?
But there are so many opinions out there so which are truth and which are not?
I really want to know what is occurring in real life.
So let’s see.
So what is the CDC saying now?
So the CDC is finally coming around to natural immunity after almost 2 years of ridiculing and blaming everyone who did not get mRNA jabbed for their own reasons.
So is the following tweet true?
I think everyone should be allowed to decide their own answer to these questions.
But I also think we need to be allowed to ask questions and get them answered without gas-lighting, delaying and hiding behind a “I don’t remember or I don’t recall” defense.
Maybe just maybe we will get there and find out once and for all how safe and effective the mRNA injections are both in the short and long term. That’s all I want. I want the truth and I can handle the truth
Like Florida or not, I hope they get a good real debate going and all the truth comes out. The truth is always the best way forward.
https://open.substack.com/pub/thekylebecker/p/the-big-lie-that-covid-19-was-pandemic?r=eowxj&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Were the two sentences actually posted in the same paragraph???? I read them and said "Whaaaat?" I'd say that's a good example of double speak. Ugh😡