Discussion about this post

User's avatar
glmcclure's avatar

Just some additional "Food for Thought": Perhaps sugar is not the problem.

White sugar uses 8 chemicals to process it from cane juice to sucrose+molasses, then adds an anti-caking agent. And if you want "brown sugar", why they just mix the two processed forms back together! The manufacturers will tell you that none of those chemicals remain

in the finished product. Sure.

And people today eat multiple "doses" of this in every meal, every snack, every drink, every day, every day of their life, often beginning with baby formula and ending with "Adult Nourishment" for the elderly.

Perhaps its not JUST the sugar (and carbs) that is the root cause of the problem, but also the residual chemicals and multiple frequencies of ingestion that affect our natural digestive metabolism as well.

Expand full comment
Lisa Shiroff's avatar

This explains why so many people I know are surprised to discover they have type 2 after years of being "fine." And then, despite the drugs prescribed and the lifestyle management hacks involved, their health continues to dwindle.

I'm curious...having recently begun eating low-carb, I've already lost a few pounds (yay, me!). However, I need to take a fiber supplement, and I'm a bit anxious about missing out on nutrients (can I get all the phytonutrients needed for optimum health by eating "the rainbow" on just 1/4 of my plate?).

Do you think it would be possible for someone to eat low-carb to get their body back in balance and reach their target weight, and once there somehow transition to eating a la Dr. Mark Hyman's "Pegan" strategy without risking things like diabetes?

His plan, too, focuses on a low-glycemic load and sees insulin resistance as the root of all evil when it comes to health. But it calls for more plants in the diet.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts